PF: Where should the list of 5 publications and relevant previous projects be included?

The list of up to five publications, relevant previous projects, or significant infrastructure should not be filled in Part A. If filled in this will be disregarded by the evaluators. This information however should be described in the relevant sections of part B-2.

PF: Do applicants have to complete the List of publications and List of previous projects in Part A?

No. If filled in this will be disregarded by the evaluators. This information however should be described in the relevant sections of part B-2.

DN: Regarding the list of publications, projects or activities, and significant infrastructures on p. 10 of 17 of the Doctoral Networks Application form, and the instructions on p. 12 of 13 of the Guide for Applicants that “neither the beneficiaries, nor the associated partners, need to fill in the list ... This information however will need to be described in the relevant sections of part B2.”, does this mean this information should not appear in Part A at all, or this information should only be mentioned in Part A by the coordinator of the proposal?

The list of publications, projects or activities, and significant infrastructures should not appear in Part A at all but in Part B2 for all participating organisations.

Part A which is to be filled online is the same for all Horizon Europe calls. On p. 12 of 13 of the Guide for applicants, it is specified that in part A, neither the beneficiaries, nor the associated partners need to fill in the list of up to five publications, relevant previous projects, or significant infrastructures. It is only requested in the description of the participating organisations in Part B2.

PF: Does the list on page 12 of 20 of the MSCA PF proposal template concerning the List of up to 5 publications and 5 most relevant previous projects refer to the researcher or the research organisation?

The five publications/software/etc. section is present both for the coordinator organisation (host) as well as for other associated partners (i.e. those hosting the outgoing phase or a non-academic placement). In the first case, the list can pertain the researcher, the supervisor, the research group that will host the researcher, etc. as long as they are related to the proposal. In the second case, the information should be relevant to the specific associated partner (supervisor/partner institution of outgoing phase/placement).